Pages

Showing posts with label meaning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label meaning. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

DIY: the Fool emerges--again

image: Rider-Waite Tarot card, The Fool
00 the Fool, Rider-Waite Tarot Deck, Wikipedia

***
The image of the Fool stepping off a cliff got stuck in my mind again today. In an effort to find out what was brewing there under the surface, I first looked at the fool archetype, then archetypes in general, then Jung's archetypes, specifically. There's a lot of substance in Jung's ideas about archetypes, but little about what they mean to an individual. Putting one's self into a labelled box is somewhat self-defeating.

After accumulating all these lovely references, I began looking for something more associated with life meaning. And found Mark Manson's 7 Strange questions that help you find your life purpose. His strange and oddly beautiful questions are quoted below.

***
Jan Matejko, StaƄczyk(Jester), Wikipedia
***
First, there's the Fool. Wikipedia has an article about the wise fool. Fallen Angel at StOttilien has an article titled Crazy Wisdom – the Archetype of the Fool, the Clown, the Jester and the Trickster. Myths-Dreams-Symbols describes Jung's Trickster Archetype thus
The trickster is a very important archetype in the history of man. He is a god, yet he is not. He is the wise-fool. It is he, through his creations that destroy, points out the flaws in carefully constructed societies of man. He rebels against authority, pokes fun at the overly serious, creates convaluted [sic] schemes - that may or may not work - plays with the Laws of the Universe and is sometimes his own worst enemy. He exists to question, to cause us to question & not accept things blindly. He appears when a way of thinking becomes outmoded needs to be torn down built anew. He is the Destroyer of Worlds at the same time the savior of us all.
Carl Jung "understood archetypes as universal, archaic patterns and images that derive from the collective unconscious and are the psychic counterpart of instinct (Wikipedia)." One interpreter of Jung's ideas on archetypes is Carl Golden at SoulCraft. An interesting view of archetypes is presented in 12 Best Character Archetypes For Film: Part 1.

You can find a varied list of articles on the Finding Meaning page at Huffington Post.

But for real self-help take a look at these 7 strange questions posed by Mark Manson.
1. What’s your favorite flavor of shit sandwich and does it come with an olive?
2. What is true about you today that would make your 8-year-old self cry?
3. What makes you forget to eat and poop?
4. How can you better embarrass yourself?
5. How are you going to save the world?
6. Gun to your head, if you had to leave the house all day, every day, where would you go and what would you do?
7. If you knew you were going to die one year from today, what would you do and how would you want to be remembered?

-- Marge



Tuesday, August 07, 2012

Nuts and bolts of visual arts, part 1

Most artists like the freedom of creating whatever they damn well please, however they please.  But to communicate effectively in a visual medium, a little learning is a good thing.  There are rules for composition, and design elements to consider.  Remember though, some of the best art breaks at least one of the rules, but probably not all of them.

Marvin Bartel speaks of composition and design from a teacher's perspective. It all boils down to what you want to emphasize in the work and how to present it cohesively. As an artist, you must consider the viewer and direct the viewer's eye.

Meaning in art can be elusive.  It's pretty clear in Goya's "The Third of May, 1808" what the artist intended.
***
image:  Goya's "The Third of May, 1808"
***

Van Gogh's rapture is pretty clear in "Starry Night." Note that the Moon isn't in the center of the image; it's almost off the edge. What is in the center is the flow. The trees act as a counterpoint to the Moon.
***
image:  Van Gogh's "Starry Night"
***

But what do you take away from viewing Mondrian's "Composition II in Red, Blue, and Yellow"?
***
image: painting by Piet Mondrian, Composition II in Red, Blue, and, Yellow (1930)
Piet Mondriaan, "Composition II in Red, Blue, and Yellow, Wikipedia
***

Seems to me that some works are done with a message in mind or result in having a message, but some may be just eye candy (or they may have messages few can interpret).  If you have something to say that is larger than what you're working on, that needs to be practiced too.  For an excellent discussion of meaning in art, check out this from a forum at xkcd.


-- Marge