Cartoon: Trump's first 100 days

This post is late because I'm so tired from watching the news to see if Trump does something truly stupid and I should prepare to flee. Actually this statement is an alternative fact, but I figure if the POTUS can do it, so can I.

***

David Horsey, The Week

***

-- Marge

Cartoons: White House anomalies

So far we've seen a number of events and actions coming from and related to the White House that just don't make sense and/or look fishy.

Trump's trips to Mar-a-Lago and their estimated cost are still an unknown, but they look pretty pricey. The sheriff of the local police department says his department has accrued $1.5 million in overtime costs and he thinks the Feds will reimburse him.

***

Bill Day, The Week

***

Cartoonist Tom Toles suggests that Trump's infrastruction plan includes privatizing national monuments. Seems plausible to me.

***

Tom Toles, The Week

***

Meanwhile the U.S.S. Carl Vinson may have made an illegal left turn, maybe not.

***

Nate Beeler, The Week

***

For sure, many Trump products for sale were not manufactured in the U.S.

***

Chan Lowe, The Week

***

In closing, here are some basic truths about the U.S. vs. Korea matter.

***

Drew Sheneman, The Week

***

-- Marge

Cartoons: brutality in the aisle

Just to be clear, United Flight 3411--the one where Dr. David Dao was ejected--was not overbooked (money.cnn.com, usatoday.com, inc.com, and forbes.com). Christine Negroni in the Forbes article says:

On Tuesday, United appeared to acknowledge that this was not technically an overbooked flight. And the reason for that equivocation is also clear. The four airline employees who needed the seats, presented themselves to the gate agent after the flight was boarded. Further, they were not fare-paying passengers, therefore not "booked."

Some argue this parsing of words is irrelevant and that the airline's contract of carriage is meant to be applied more broadly. Not true. Airlines are required to present bumped passengers with the written document explaining their rights. I would not bet on the success of a legal argument that begins, "what the document intended to express."

 So much for legalities, here are some cartoonists' takes on the incident.

***

Nate Beeler, The Week

***

Drew Sheneman, The Week

***

Jack Ohman, The Week

***

And, if only...

***

Gary Varvel, The Week

***

-- Marge

Cartoons: Trump's privacy is more important than mine or yours

Twitter-King Trump's claim that Obama wiretapped him lingers on. In the meantime he has repealed the internet privacy rules passed last year using the

Congressional Review Act (CRA) that allows Congress and the president to overturn recently passed agency regulations. A successful CRA bill also prevents the agency from implementing similar rules in the future. (The Hill) 

There's a timeline of Trump's "false wiretapping charge" at Politifact.

Here's a visual aid.

*** 

Glenn McCoy, The Week

***

And who really knows the current state of the Republicans' "new" health care plan?

***

Steve Sack, The Week

***

-- Marge